Roggenwolf - next generation digital camouflage
Australian Special Air Service recruiting poster

kamouflage.net camouflage data

Uncover your potential', indeed! Once you stop ogling the girl, though, you might notice that this Australian Special Air Service (SAS) recruiting poster shows Australian Disruptive Pattern Camouflage to very good effect. [Image courtesy Brad Turner collection.]

Bundeswehr-Sägezahnmuster
Federal Republic of Germany

During the second half of 1976, the Bundeswehr conducted a series of 'troop trials' (Truppenversuch) in co-operation with the French army. The aim of these trials was to gauge the effectiveness of five newly developed camouflage patterns: Sägezahnmuster; Punktmuster; Flecktarn A (klein); Flecktarn B (groß); and Flecktarn C.

Of these, the first four camouflage designs were four-colour patterns, comprising black, dark green, light-green, olive grey and red earth elements; the main differences between them were the shapes and sizes of the elements. Those used in Sägezahnmuster ('saw-tooth pattern') — shown here — were reminiscent of blades for a circular saw, but the other three patterns were composed of coloured clumps and dots: Punktmuster ('point camouflage') featured large clumps and small dots; Flecktarn A (klein) ('dot camouflage A, small') featured larger dots and the clumps had a more open, lacy appearance; and Flecktarn B (groß) ('dot camouflage B, large') displayed even larger dots.

The last camouflage pattern, officially labelled Flecktarn C ('dot camouflage C') but also dubbed Schattentarn, was definitely the odd-man-out at the trials. It was a three-colour camouflage pattern of dark green, light green and olive grey, and comprised the outlines of the shapes used in Flecktarn A (klein). The contrast between the colours used is extremely low, and it seems unlikely that this design could ever offer much in the way of a camouflage effect.

Of the five patterns trialled during Truppenversuch, Flecktarn B was adjudged to be the most effective. However, the issue of this camouflage pattern was delayed until after Erprobung 1988 ('Proofing 1988') and the successful conclusion of the 1989 Truppenversuch “Kampfanzug 90” ('Troop Trials, "Battle Suit 90"').

This reasons for this lengthy delay are unclear. One possibility is that the decision was taken so that the Bundeswehr should remain dressed like its NATO partners, who — with the notable exceptions of France and the United Kingdom — wore olive drab uniforms.

Whatever the reasons might actually have been, uniforms camouflaged in Flecktarn B — better known as Bundeswehr-Flecktarnmuster — were not issued to soldiers of the Bundeswehr until 1990.

kamouflage.net is grateful to Dan Feldkamp, for his invaluable contributions to this article. Please visit Dan's Web site, Truppenversuche der Bundeswehr 1976–1994.

camouflage data

1cm grid

Bundeswehr-Sägezahnmuster
1976

Specimen of Bundeswehr-Sägezahnmuster

Specimen kindly supplied by Daniel Peterson/The Crowood Press Ltd

Actual size: not known

also known as:
  • Sägezahnmuster ('saw-tooth pattern')
  • saw-tooth pattern
country of origin:

Bundesrepublik Deutschland

National flag: Federal Republic of Germany

Federal Republic of Germany

used by:
  • never issued

Web site © 2004–2010 Brad Turner. Images copyright © Brad Turner or their respective owners, as indicated.

All rights reserved. Except as provided by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this Web site may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of Brad Turner.

kamouflage.net is a Web site dedicated to the subject of military camouflage patterns and camouflage uniforms. It does not endorse political or religious extremism, subversive or terrorist activities, civil disobedience, or any unlawful action. Neither will it incite, assist, or otherwise participate in the persecution of any individual or group for reasons of age, disability, gender, race, religion, national origin, political opinion, or sexuality. Links to other Web sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.